Most institutional staff development is supply-led: a workshop calendar is published, academics attend what fits their timetable, and little changes in the classroom. A needs-oriented approach inverts this. It begins not with what is on offer but with a clear, evidenced diagnosis of what an individual teacher actually needs to improve — and then seeks or builds the development to meet it. This is the difference between collecting attendance certificates and genuinely becoming a better teacher.
This article sets out how any academic, in any higher-education system, can construct a needs-based teaching development plan. It moves from honest self-diagnosis, through the two richest sources of evidence — peer observation and student feedback — to formal recognition through teaching frameworks and, ultimately, into the scholarship of teaching and learning, where your development itself becomes a contribution to knowledge. The principles hold whether you teach in Nairobi, Manila, Manchester or Manitoba.
Why development must start from needs
Development that is not anchored to a genuine need tends to default to whatever is convenient or fashionable, and its effect on practice is correspondingly weak. A needs-first approach forces a prior question: what, specifically, is not working as well as it could in my teaching? Perhaps students disengage in large lectures, or your assessment is generating grade disputes, or you have never learned to teach online well. Naming the need precisely is what makes the subsequent development purposeful.
This approach also respects the reality of academic time. Faculty cannot attend everything, and a scattershot approach wastes the little professional-development time they have. Targeting the two or three needs that would most improve your students' learning concentrates limited hours where they matter. For the broader craft, see our Teaching & Assessment hub, which complements the developmental focus here.
Diagnosing your real teaching needs
Accurate diagnosis draws on multiple sources, because self-perception alone is unreliable — we are poor judges of our own teaching. Triangulate three streams of evidence: your own reflection on what feels difficult or unsatisfying; student feedback, both formal surveys and informal signals like attendance and engagement; and outcome data such as assessment results, failure rates and the questions students repeatedly get wrong. Where these three point to the same issue, you have found a real need.
Write the resulting needs as specific, actionable statements rather than vague aspirations. "Improve my teaching" is not a plan; "reduce the proportion of students failing the mid-semester problem set by improving how I scaffold problem-solving" is. Prioritise ruthlessly and record your plan somewhere you will revisit it. A durable professional identity across institutions helps here too — maintaining an ORCID record that captures teaching contributions alongside research keeps your development legible over a career. Our guide to using assessment data shows how to mine outcome evidence for needs.
Peer observation done well
Peer observation is the most underused high-value development tool in higher education. A trusted colleague watching you teach sees things you cannot: the students you unconsciously ignore, the question that confused half the room, the pacing that lost the back rows. Done in a spirit of development rather than judgement, it produces specific, actionable feedback no survey can match. The key is to frame it as collegial and formative, agree beforehand what you want observed, and separate it entirely from any appraisal process.
Reciprocity makes it sustainable and safe: you observe each other, and both learn, including the observer, who invariably picks up ideas from watching a colleague work. Structure it with a brief pre-observation conversation about your goals, a focused observation against those goals, and a prompt debrief while it is fresh. Rotate observers over time so you gather diverse perspectives. Our peer observation protocol provides a ready template for running it well.
Turning student feedback into change
Student feedback is abundant but frequently wasted, because it is collected at the end of a course when it can no longer help the students who gave it, and then read defensively for the sting of negative comments rather than mined for patterns. The remedy is to gather feedback early and midway through a course, when you can still act on it, and to read it for recurring themes rather than reacting to individual outliers. A single harsh comment is noise; the same concern from a dozen students is signal.
Close the loop visibly: tell students what you changed in response to their feedback, which both improves the course and increases the quality and honesty of future feedback. Keep a simple record of the feedback themes you identified each term and the changes you made, so your development is evidenced over time rather than forgotten. AcademicStaff's teaching portfolio builder is designed to capture this cycle of feedback, response and impact in a form you can later use for promotion or fellowship applications.
Frameworks, fellowships and microcredentials
Needs-based development gains durability and recognition when it is anchored to a recognised framework. Many systems now offer professional recognition for teaching: the UK's Advance HE fellowship categories mapped to the Professional Standards Framework are widely adopted internationally, and comparable teaching-recognition and accreditation schemes exist across regions. Working toward such recognition gives your development structure and produces a credential that travels between institutions and countries.
Microcredentials and short courses — increasingly available online and often free through platforms and open universities — let you target a specific need without committing to a full qualification. Choose them by the need they address, not their convenience, and integrate what you learn into a coherent portfolio rather than accumulating disconnected certificates. Advance HE's Professional Standards Framework, described at advance-he.ac.uk, is a useful reference point even where you are not pursuing UK fellowship, because its dimensions of practice give a common language for teaching development.
Moving into the scholarship of teaching
The most advanced form of needs-based development is the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), in which you treat a teaching problem as a research question: you identify an issue, design an intervention, gather evidence of its effect, and share the findings through publication or conference presentation. This transforms your development from private improvement into a public contribution, and — crucially in most reward systems — into an output that counts alongside disciplinary research.
SoTL closes the circle of a needs-based approach: the very need you diagnosed becomes the seed of scholarship. A teacher troubled by high failure rates in a gateway course can study the effect of a redesign and publish the result, improving their own teaching, informing colleagues, and strengthening their promotion case simultaneously. Start small, partner with an education-focused colleague if the methods are unfamiliar, and keep rigorous records of your interventions. The AcademicStaff teaching portfolio builder and publication ledger together let you carry a SoTL project from classroom observation to published output without losing the evidence trail. For related career framing, see our guide to teaching-focused career paths.
The Needs-Based Teaching Development Planner
A self-diagnosis worksheet that triangulates reflection, student feedback and outcome data into two or three prioritised development needs, with a peer-observation template and an action-tracking log.
Want the full article?
Enter your email for free access to the rest of this guide and our TEQSA resource library.
Frequently asked questions
How do I identify my real teaching development needs rather than guessing?
Triangulate three sources: your own honest reflection, student feedback both formal and informal, and outcome data such as assessment results and failure rates. Where all three point to the same issue, you have found a genuine need. Self-perception alone is unreliable, so evidence from multiple angles is essential.
Is peer observation useful if my institution does not require it?
Very. Peer observation is arguably more valuable when it is voluntary and collegial rather than tied to appraisal, because it can be purely developmental. Arrange a reciprocal arrangement with a trusted colleague, agree what to focus on beforehand, and debrief promptly. Both parties learn, including the observer.
What is the scholarship of teaching and learning and why does it matter?
SoTL treats a teaching problem as a research question — you design an intervention, gather evidence of its effect, and share the findings. It turns private improvement into a public, citable contribution that in most reward systems counts alongside disciplinary research, so your teaching development also advances your career.
The AcademicStaff editorial team writes practical, evidence-based guidance for university staff — drawing on sector reporting, funder guidelines and the lived administrative reality of academic work. Every guide is reviewed for accuracy against current Australian higher-education practice.